Astrophysics
[Submitted on 27 Jun 2007]
Title:Intrinsic alignments of galaxies and their effects on weak lensing detections of mass concentrations
View PDFAbstract: In this paper we investigate the influence of the intrinsic alignment of background galaxies on weak lensing detections of mass concentrations. Specifically, we analyze the number counts of false peaks resulting from intrinsic ellipticities in lensing convergence maps. Including the alignment of source galaxies, the full noise variance from intrinsic ellipticites in convergence $\kappa$-maps can be written as $\sigma^2_0=\sigma^2_{0ran}+\sigma^2_{0corr}$, where $\sigma^2_{0ran}$ is the noise contributed from randomly oriented source galaxies and $\sigma^2_{0corr}$ denotes the additional noise from intrinsic alignments. However, it is observationally difficult to measure $\sigma^2_{0corr}$ and usually only $\sigma^2_{0ran}$ can be estimated in weak lensing observations. Thus the observational signal-to-noise ratio is often defined with respect to $\sigma_{0ran}$, which is denoted as $\nu_{ran}$ in this paper. The true signal-to-noise ratio $\nu$ in terms of $\sigma_0$ is then $\nu=\nu_{ran}/(1+\sigma^2_{0corr}/\sigma^2_{0ran})^{1/2}$. Given a detection threshold on $\nu_{ran}$, a larger value of $\sigma^2_{0corr}/\sigma^2_{0ran}$ leads to a lower threshold on $\nu$ and therefore a larger expected number of false peaks. With $\sigma^2_{0corr}/\sigma^2_{0ran}\sim 10%$, the average number of false peaks with $\nu_{ran}\ge 3.5$ nearly doubles compared to that without considering the alignment, and for $\nu_{ran}\ge 5$, the number is tripled. As a result, the efficiency of weak lensing cluster detection degrades significantly. (Abridged)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.