Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 17 Feb 2016 (v1), last revised 15 May 2016 (this version, v2)]
Title:$μ$-Distortions or Running: A Guaranteed Discovery from CMB Spectrometry
View PDFAbstract:We discuss the implications of a PIXIE-like experiment, which would measure $\mu$-type spectral distortions of the CMB at a level of $\sigma_{\mu}=(1/n)\times 10^{-8}$, with $n\geq1$ representing an improved sensitivity (e.g. $n=10$ corresponds to PRISM). Using Planck data and considering the six-parameter $\Lambda$CDM model, we compute the posterior for $\mu_8\equiv\mu\times 10^{8}$ and find $\mu_8=1.57^{+0.11}_{-0.13}$ ($68\%\,\mathrm{CL}$). This becomes $\mu_{8} = 1.28^{+0.30}_{-0.52}$ ($68\%\,\mathrm{CL}$) when the running $\alpha_\mathrm{s}$ of the spectral index is included. We point out that a sensitivity of about $3\times$ PIXIE implies a guaranteed discovery: $\mu$-distortion is detected or $\alpha_\mathrm{s}\geq 0$ is excluded (both at $95\%\,\mathrm{CL}$ or higher). This threshold sensitivity sets a clear benchmark for CMB spectrometry. For a combined analysis of PIXIE and current Planck data, we discuss the improvement on measurements of the tilt $n_\mathrm{s}$ and the running $\alpha_\mathrm{s}$ and the dependence on the choice of the pivot. A fiducial running of $\alpha_\mathrm{s}=-0.01$ (close to the Planck best-fit) leads to a detection of negative running at $2\sigma$ for $5\times$ PIXIE. A fiducial running of $\alpha_\mathrm{s}=-0.02$, still compatible with Planck, requires $3\times$ PIXIE to rule out $\alpha_\mathrm{s} = 0$ (at $95\%\,\mathrm{CL}$). We propose a convenient and compact visualization of the improving constraints on the tilt, running and tensor-to-scalar ratio.
Submission history
From: Giovanni Cabass [view email][v1] Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:00:02 UTC (971 KB)
[v2] Sun, 15 May 2016 11:28:23 UTC (972 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.