Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
[Submitted on 31 Aug 2021 (v1), last revised 29 Apr 2024 (this version, v3)]
Title:Using convolutional neural networks for the classification of breast cancer images
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:An important part of breast cancer staging is the assessment of the sentinel axillary node for early signs of tumor spreading. However, this assessment by pathologists is not always easy and retrospective surveys often requalify the status of a high proportion of sentinel nodes. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a class of deep learning algorithms that have shown excellent performances in the most challenging visual classification tasks, with numerous applications in medical imaging. In this study I compare twelve different CNNs and different hardware acceleration devices for the detection of breast cancer from microscopic images of breast cancer tissue. Convolutional models are trained and tested on two public datasets. The first one is composed of more than 300,000 images of sentinel lymph node tissue from breast cancer patients, while the second one has more than 220,000 images from inductive breast carcinoma tissue, one of the most common forms of breast cancer. Four different hardware acceleration cards were used, with an off-the-shelf deep learning framework. The impact of transfer learning and hyperparameters fine-tuning are tested. Hardware acceleration device performance can improve training time by a factor of five to twelve, depending on the model used. On the other hand, increasing convolutional depth will augment the training time by a factor of four to six times, depending on the acceleration device used. Increasing the depth and the complexity of the model generally improves performance, but the relationship is not linear and also depends on the architecture of the model. The performance of transfer learning is always worse compared to a complete retraining of the model. Fine-tuning the hyperparameters of the model improves the results, with the best model showing a performance comparable to state-of-the-art models.
Submission history
From: Eric Bonnet [view email][v1] Tue, 31 Aug 2021 07:53:41 UTC (387 KB)
[v2] Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:15:20 UTC (387 KB)
[v3] Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:53:17 UTC (483 KB)
Current browse context:
q-bio.QM
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.