Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 12 Apr 2022 (v1), last revised 26 Oct 2023 (this version, v6)]
Title:How much of the past matters? Using dynamic survival models for the monitoring of potassium in heart failure patients using electronic health records
View PDFAbstract:Statistical methods to study the association between a longitudinal biomarker and the risk of death are very relevant for the long-term care of subjects affected by chronic illnesses, such as potassium in heart failure patients. Particularly in the presence of comorbidities or pharmacological treatments, sudden crises can cause potassium to undergo very abrupt yet transient changes. In the context of the monitoring of potassium, there is a need for a dynamic model that can be used in clinical practice to assess the risk of death related to an observed patient's potassium trajectory. We considered different dynamic survival approaches, starting from the simple approach considering the most recent measurement, to the joint model. We then propose a novel method based on wavelet filtering and landmarking to retrieve the prognostic role of past short-term potassium shifts. We argue that while taking into account past information is important, not all past information is equally informative. State-of-the-art dynamic survival models are prone to give more importance to the mean long-term value of potassium. However, our findings suggest that it is essential to take into account also recent potassium instability to capture all the relevant prognostic information. The data used comes from over 2000 subjects, with a total of over 80 000 repeated potassium measurements collected through Administrative Health Records and Outpatient and Inpatient Clinic E-charts. A novel dynamic survival approach is proposed in this work for the monitoring of potassium in heart failure. The proposed wavelet landmark method shows promising results revealing the prognostic role of past short-term changes, according to their different duration, and achieving higher performances in predicting the survival probability of individuals.
Submission history
From: Caterina Gregorio [view email][v1] Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:09:59 UTC (1,179 KB)
[v2] Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:55:30 UTC (1,179 KB)
[v3] Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:20:56 UTC (1,292 KB)
[v4] Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:37:52 UTC (1,686 KB)
[v5] Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:58:44 UTC (2,281 KB)
[v6] Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:03:49 UTC (2,281 KB)
Current browse context:
stat.ME
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.