Astrophysics
[Submitted on 10 Nov 2000 (v1), last revised 13 Mar 2001 (this version, v3)]
Title:Simulations of Deep Pencil-Beam Redshift Surveys
View PDFAbstract: We create mock pencil-beam redshift surveys from very large cosmological $N$-body simulations of two Cold Dark Matter cosmogonies, an Einstein-de Sitter model ($\tau$CDM) and a flat model with $\Omega_0 =0.3$ and a cosmological constant ($\Lambda$CDM). We use these to assess the significance of the apparent periodicity discovered by Broadhurst et al. (1990). Simulation particles are tagged as `galaxies' so as to reproduce observed present-day correlations. They are then identified along the past light-cones of hypothetical observers to create mock catalogues with the geometry and the distance distribution of the Broadhurst et al. data. We produce 1936 (2625) quasi-independent catalogues from our $\tau$CDM ($\Lambda$CDM) simulation. A couple of large clumps in a catalogue can produce a high peak at low wavenumbers in the corresponding one-dimensional power spectrum, without any apparent large-scale periodicity in the original redshift histogram. Although the simulated redshift histograms frequently display regularly spaced clumps, the spacing of these clumps varies between catalogues and there is no `preferred' period over our many realisations. We find only a 0.72 (0.49) per cent chance that the highest peak in the power spectrum of a $\tau$CDM ($\Lambda$CDM) catalogue has a peak-to-noise ratio higher than that in the Broadhurst et al. data. None of the simulated catalogues with such high peaks shows coherently spaced clumps with a significance as high as that of the real data. We conclude that in CDM universes, the kind of regularity observed by Broadhurst et al. has a priori probability well below $10^{-3}$.
Submission history
From: Naoki Yoshida [view email][v1] Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:26:54 UTC (130 KB)
[v2] Sat, 11 Nov 2000 13:36:44 UTC (170 KB)
[v3] Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:22:55 UTC (313 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.