Astrophysics
[Submitted on 30 Oct 1994]
Title:Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1
View PDFAbstract: We present techniques for identifying and analyzing galaxy groups and show that they provide a powerful discriminator between cosmological models. We apply these to high-resolution PM N-body simulations of structure formation in CHDM (cold/hot/baryon fractions=.6/.3/.1, b=1.5 (COBE norm) and two CDM models; b=1.5 and b=1.0 (COBE norm). Groups are identified with the Nolthenius (1993) algorithm. We find: (1) Properties of groups are a powerful and robust discriminator between these Gaussian models whose spatial and velocity properties differ on Mpc scales. We test robustness against several methods for assigning luminosity to dark matter halos, for merging CfA1 galaxies, and for breaking up massive over-mergers (2) When allowance is made for the high large scale power P(k) present in the CfA1 data, CHDM at our $\Omnu=0.30$ produces slightly too many groups and groups too high a fraction of the galaxies, while the fraction grouped in CDM is far too low. Lowering $\Omnu$ would appear to produce close agreement with all measures, save one: for all simulations, median group sizes are x1.4-1.7 larger than equivalently selected CfA1 groups. (3) The standard group M/L method gives $\Omega\simeq 0.1$ for CHDM and CfA1, and $\Omega\simeq 0.35$ for CDM. A conspiracy of three effects produce these very low values, and we conclude that low observed $\Omega$'s need not argue for a low $\Omega$ universe. When overmergers are broken up, the median virial- to-DM mass of 3D selected groups is $\sim1$ for all simulations. $M_{DM}>10^{14}\Msun$ groups appear virialized in all simulations. Global velocity biases $b_v$ are similar to previous studies. Within 3D-selected groups, CHDM and CDM b=1.5 show a stronger bias of $b_v=0.7-0.8$, while CDM b=1.0 shows group $b_v$'s $\simeq 1$.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.